ADC Systems Optimization
Balance target biology, construct design, exposure and safety across the complete ADC system.
Explore construct combinations, optimize linker and conjugation choices, compare ADC PK/PD and therapeutic-window trade-offs, and convert liabilities into specific redesign actions.

Identify which construct to advance—and what to redesign.
Design-Space Reduction
From thousands of construct combinations to a Pareto-optimal shortlist
MedMap filters chemistry-valid designs, scores system-level performance and retains Pareto-efficient constructs so teams can compare meaningful trade-offs rather than rely on a single composite score.
Raw design space
3,476
raw combinations
Chemistry-valid space
500
chemistry-valid designs
Fully scored
500
fully scored constructs
Pareto frontier
8
Pareto-optimal constructs
Recommendation
1
recommended construct with rationale
Decision dimensions: Efficacy / Synergy / Safety / Developability / Manufacturability

Linker & Site Optimization
Optimize payload arms, linker chemistry and conjugation sites independently

Defect-to-Action Planner
Translate predicted liabilities into specific construct changes
ADC PK/PD & Safety Window
Connect construct design to tumor payload delivery and systemic safety
Circulating intact ADC
Tumor-associated and internalized ADC
Released payload
ADC CONSTRUCT-LEVEL OPTIMIZATION

DAR & CONJUGATION
Site-specific • DAR 4
LINKER STABILITY
FAVORABLE
SYSTEMIC PAYLOAD RISK
MODERATE
RECOMMENDATION
Advance as primary construct
Retain lower-DAR backup
Construct Comparison
Compare component choices and system-level consequences together
From molecular ideas to the next experimental decision
Discuss a focused project review, pilot scope or complete optimization program with MedMap.
Compare ADC Construct Concepts